NEURODESIGN® · CORPUS

Browse

Six ways into 121 records. The two that matter most are evidence strength and translation distance, and they are meant to be read together: a strong mechanism can still sit several inferential steps from a decision about a building.

Terms shown without a count carry no source yet. They are left visible on purpose. The taxonomy states what the corpus intends to cover, so an empty term is a search that has not been run.

Evidence strength 6

How much weight a finding can carry on its own, from replicated human evidence down to early exploratory work. Read it alongside translation distance, never on its own.

Translation distance 5

How many inferential steps sit between what a study actually measured and a claim about a building. A strong mechanism can still be several steps away from a design decision.

Field 17

The discipline a source belongs to, from direct neuroarchitecture through to public health and exposure science.

Mechanism 34

The route by which an environment is proposed to act on a person: attention, autonomic state, circadian timing, spatial coding and the rest.

no source yet: Odor-evoked memory. See research gaps.

Spatial variable 42

The thing an architect can actually specify: ceiling height, ventilation rate, reverberation time, spectral content, wood exposure.

no source yet: Acoustic privacy, Air quality perception, Material texture, Spatial transitions, Visual privacy, Window-to-wall ratio, Wood orientation / grain. See research gaps.

Source type 8

What kind of evidence the record is, collapsed into families. Reviews and meta-analyses overlap by design, so their study counts are ingestion queues rather than additive totals.