Comparison of reality and virtual reality spatial electroencephalogram measurement data

What the study found

Reported no meaningful difference in the EEG implementation of matched real and virtual spatial conditions in the studied setup.

Limitations

Short conference paper; limited methodological detail; requires replication with larger samples and modern VR systems.

Neurodesign interpretation

If VR is going to become Neurodesign's experimental workbench, matched physical-space validation deserves its own evidence track.

Possible design implications

Use as a lead for the ecological-validity branch of the corpus.

Why it stays in the corpus

Retain because direct real-versus-VR validation is rare.

Study design

Conference experiment

Population

Human participants

Setting

Real and virtual architectural space

Field

Neuroarchitecture, methods

Mechanism

VR validity, EEG comparability

Spatial variable

Physical versus matched virtual space

Keywords

VR validity, EEG, real space, conference