ND-0042 · 2026 · Systematic review
A comprehensive review of neuroarchitecture measurement tools and methods
Authors per journal record. Building and Environment. 2026-02-01.
doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.114103 · Web-verified
What the study found
EEG dominates the field; affect is studied more often than cognition or decision-making; multimodal standardization remains limited.
Limitations
Measurement diversity and small-study designs limit synthesis across studies.
Neurodesign interpretation
The field has a measurement imbalance. Adding more EEG is less useful than connecting brain, autonomic, behavior and subjective data around one well-defined spatial manipulation.
Possible design implications
Build Neurodesign studies around multimodal outcomes, preregistered spatial variables and repeatable exposure protocols.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as the 2026 methods benchmark.
Study design
PRISMA systematic review
Population
Humans across 140 neuroarchitecture studies
Setting
Physical and immersive environments
Field
Neuroarchitecture
Mechanism
CNS, PNS, behavioral and subjective measurement
Spatial variable
Built-environment stimuli
Keywords
neuroarchitecture, EEG, methods, HRV, EDA, VR
indexed under
Field
Mechanism
related records
- ND-0002Indoor environmental quality and the brain: A systematic review of physiological and neural evidence
- ND-0083Physiological effects of visual stimulation with full-scale wall images composed of vertically and horizontally arranged wooden elements
- ND-0001How indoor environmental quality affects occupants' cognitive functions: A systematic review
- ND-0008The effects of air temperature on office workers' well-being, workload and productivity-evaluated with subjective ratings
- ND-0017Multimodal evidence of temperature and sex effects on sleep: sleep physiology, sleep quality, and next-day performance
- ND-0023A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks