ND-0002 · 2026 · Systematic review
Indoor environmental quality and the brain: A systematic review of physiological and neural evidence
Authors per journal record. Building and Environment. 2026.
doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2026.114405 · Web-verified
What the study found
Visual and thermal conditions showed the most consistent relationships with neural and physiological signals across the reviewed evidence.
Limitations
Small and heterogeneous primary-study samples; measurement protocols remain inconsistent.
Neurodesign interpretation
This review marks a shift from asking whether occupants like a room to asking what the room is doing to the body while they occupy it.
Possible design implications
Pair subjective comfort surveys with CNS and autonomic measures when testing design interventions.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as a 2026 state-of-the-field bridge between IEQ and neurophysiology.
Study design
Systematic review plus bibliometric mapping
Population
Human participants in 32 empirical studies
Setting
Laboratory and built environments
Field
Neuroarchitecture, building science
Mechanism
Neural and autonomic response to environmental exposure
Spatial variable
Visual conditions, thermal conditions, air, acoustics
Keywords
IEQ, EEG, HRV, physiology, neural, thermal, visual
indexed under
related records
- ND-0001How indoor environmental quality affects occupants' cognitive functions: A systematic review
- ND-0012A review of the environmental parameters necessary for an optimal sleep environment
- ND-0077A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design
- ND-0006Ten questions concerning thermal and indoor air quality effects on the performance of office work and schoolwork
- ND-0007Influence of indoor air temperature on human thermal comfort, motivation and performance
- ND-0008The effects of air temperature on office workers' well-being, workload and productivity-evaluated with subjective ratings