ND-0001 · 2021 · Systematic review
How indoor environmental quality affects occupants' cognitive functions: A systematic review
Wang et al. Building and Environment. 2021.
doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107647 · Web-verified
What the study found
Poorer indoor conditions were often associated with poorer cognitive performance, but effects varied by factor, task and study design.
Limitations
Large heterogeneity; causal evidence is uneven across IEQ domains; several domains have inconsistent results.
Neurodesign interpretation
This is the backbone evidence against designing each indoor parameter in isolation. A room can meet separate comfort targets while still producing cumulative cognitive burden.
Possible design implications
Treat cognition as an emergent outcome of multiple simultaneous environmental loads rather than a single-variable effect.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as the broad cognition map for IEQ and as a source-finding review.
Study design
Systematic review; 66 focused studies plus bibliometric mapping
Population
Humans across office, school and laboratory studies
Setting
Mixed indoor settings
Field
Indoor environmental quality
Mechanism
Cognitive load, arousal, sensory stress
Spatial variable
Air quality, thermal conditions, lighting, noise, visual conditions
Keywords
IEQ, cognition, air, thermal, light, noise, visual
indexed under
related records
- ND-0002Indoor environmental quality and the brain: A systematic review of physiological and neural evidence
- ND-0012A review of the environmental parameters necessary for an optimal sleep environment
- ND-0017Multimodal evidence of temperature and sex effects on sleep: sleep physiology, sleep quality, and next-day performance
- ND-0077A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design
- ND-0008The effects of air temperature on office workers' well-being, workload and productivity-evaluated with subjective ratings
- ND-0011Effects of moderate thermal environments on cognitive performance: A multidisciplinary review