ND-0077 · 2008 · Systematic review
A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design
Ulrich et al. HERD. 2008.
doi.org/10.1177/193758670800100306 · Web-verified
What the study found
The review found design-relevant evidence across infection control, acoustics, nature/daylight, ergonomics, room type and layout, while quality varied by topic.
Limitations
Now historically dated; many included studies observational; should be paired with later reviews.
Neurodesign interpretation
Healthcare design is where architecture-outcome research became most clinically concrete, but also where confounding is highest because design changes rarely occur alone.
Possible design implications
Use it as a bibliography and compare each design claim with later updates.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as the foundational evidence-based healthcare design map.
Study design
Extensive evidence review
Population
Patients and staff across healthcare studies
Setting
Hospitals
Field
Healthcare design
Mechanism
Patient safety, stress, infection, staff outcomes
Spatial variable
Single rooms, ventilation, acoustics, nature, daylight, layout
Keywords
healthcare, evidence-based design, single rooms, daylight, acoustics
indexed under
related records
- ND-0034A systematic review and conceptual framework of biophilic design parameters in clinical environments
- ND-0035Biophilic design in healthcare: a systematic review of health and wellbeing outcomes
- ND-0001How indoor environmental quality affects occupants' cognitive functions: A systematic review
- ND-0031View through a window may influence recovery from surgery
- ND-0002Indoor environmental quality and the brain: A systematic review of physiological and neural evidence
- ND-0003Short-term exposure to indoor carbon dioxide and cognitive task performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis