ND-0045 · 2020 · Systematic review
Exploring the influence of the built environment on human experience through a neuroscience approach: A systematic review
Authors per journal record. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2020.
doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.10.005 · Web-verified
What the study found
The review identified growing use of neuroscience methods but substantial gaps in sample size, ecological validity and reproducibility.
Limitations
Early field with diverse methods and limited replication.
Neurodesign interpretation
A design claim becomes stronger when another lab can reproduce the same response to the same spatial variable.
Possible design implications
Prioritize repeatable manipulations and cross-study comparability over novelty of sensor technology.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as a methodological baseline before the recent expansion.
Study design
Systematic review
Population
Humans across included studies
Setting
Built and simulated environments
Field
Neuroarchitecture
Mechanism
Neural response to built-environment properties
Spatial variable
Architectural form and sensory variables
Keywords
neuroarchitecture, systematic review, built environment
indexed under
Field
related records
- ND-0002Indoor environmental quality and the brain: A systematic review of physiological and neural evidence
- ND-0041Implications of neuroarchitecture for the experience of the built environment: a scoping review
- ND-0042A comprehensive review of neuroarchitecture measurement tools and methods
- ND-0043Toward Evidence-Based Neuroarchitecture: A Systematic Mapping and Framework for Immersive Spatial Cognition
- ND-0044The Cognitive-Emotional Design and Study of Architectural Space: A Scoping Review of Neuroarchitecture and Its Precursor Approaches
- ND-0046Designing for human wellbeing: The integration of neuroarchitecture in design - A systematic review