ND-0671 · 1984 · Other
The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies
Finnegan MJ, Pickering CAC, Burge PS. BMJ. 1984.
doi.org/10.1136/bmj.289.6458.1573 · Finding checked against the abstract
Source details checked refers to publication information or an official source page. See the record’s limitations for incomplete extraction and the method for how to read the labels.
What the source reports
Across nine offices doing similar clerical work, workers in air-conditioned buildings reported significantly more nasal, eye and mucous membrane symptoms, lethargy, dry skin and headaches than workers in naturally ventilated ones.
Design questions and applications
Maintain systems and consider natural ventilation.
Field
Air and ventilation
Notes and follow-up
Added from the Corpus Desk (card finnegan-1984-sbs) on 2026-11-09; the card finding was rewritten from the abstract. Evidence strength and translation distance not yet rated. WELL label held for review.
indexed under
related records
- ND-0003Short-term exposure to indoor carbon dioxide and cognitive task performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- ND-0004Is CO2 an Indoor Pollutant? Direct Effects of Low-to-Moderate CO2 Concentrations on Human Decision-Making Performance
- ND-0005Associations of Cognitive Function Scores with Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers
- ND-0006Ten questions concerning thermal and indoor air quality effects on the performance of office work and schoolwork
- ND-0077A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design
- ND-0097ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2025: Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality