ND-0076 · 2021 · Systematic review
Office spatial design attributes, sitting, and face-to-face interactions: Systematic review and research agenda
Authors per journal record. Building and Environment. 2021-01.
doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107426 · Web-verified
What the study found
Greater worker visibility was associated with shorter sitting bouts, and proximity was associated with more or longer face-to-face interactions.
Limitations
Mostly observational; activity and interaction quality are not necessarily beneficial outcomes.
Neurodesign interpretation
A plan changes behavior partly by changing encounter probability. Neurodesign should distinguish interaction quantity from interaction quality and cognitive interruption.
Possible design implications
Use spatial configuration intentionally to support desired movement and interaction patterns without assuming more interaction is always better.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain for workplace behavior beyond satisfaction.
Study design
Systematic review
Population
Office workers across 20 studies
Setting
Workplaces
Field
Workplace design
Mechanism
Movement, proximity, social interaction
Spatial variable
Visibility, proximity, spatial configuration
Keywords
office, visibility, proximity, sitting, interaction
indexed under
Field
Mechanism
Spatial variable
related records
- ND-0072A Comparison of Psychological and Work Outcomes in Open-Plan and Cellular Office Designs: A Systematic Review
- ND-0005Associations of Cognitive Function Scores with Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers
- ND-0006Ten questions concerning thermal and indoor air quality effects on the performance of office work and schoolwork
- ND-0008The effects of air temperature on office workers' well-being, workload and productivity-evaluated with subjective ratings
- ND-0009Meta-analysis of 35 studies examining the effect of indoor temperature on office work performance
- ND-0010The effects of temperature on work performance in the typical office environment: A meta-analysis of current evidence