ND-0072 · 2021 · Systematic review
A Comparison of Psychological and Work Outcomes in Open-Plan and Cellular Office Designs: A Systematic Review
James, Delfabbro & King. SAGE Open. 2021-01-22.
doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988869 · Web-verified
What the study found
Open-plan offices were more often associated with poorer health, satisfaction and productivity-related outcomes, with noise and privacy recurring as major issues.
Limitations
Comparative literature is observational-heavy; office culture and management can confound layout effects.
Neurodesign interpretation
Open plan is not one spatial variable. It bundles visibility, density, speech exposure, control and territoriality, which is why single-cause claims are weak.
Possible design implications
Provide a portfolio of focus, collaboration and recovery settings rather than assuming openness serves all work.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as the strongest broad office-layout review.
Study design
Systematic review; 10,242 screened papers
Population
Office workers across 31 comparative papers
Setting
Open-plan and cellular offices
Field
Workplace design
Mechanism
Privacy, distraction, stress, social interaction
Spatial variable
Office openness, enclosure
Keywords
open plan, privacy, office, stress, productivity
indexed under
related records
- ND-0073The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature
- ND-0074Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices
- ND-0019Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration
- ND-0022Irrelevant speech effect in open-plan offices: A laboratory study
- ND-0034A systematic review and conceptual framework of biophilic design parameters in clinical environments
- ND-0120Methodological considerations in the open-plan office paradox