ND-0058 · 2016 · Meta-analysis
Evidence for prospect-refuge theory: a meta-analysis of the findings of environmental preference research
Authors per journal record. City, Territory and Architecture. 2016.
doi.org/10.1186/s40410-016-0033-1 · Web-verified
What the study found
Prospect received more consistent support than refuge in interior and urban studies; evidence for complexity was mixed but often positive; mystery was less consistently supported.
Limitations
The evidence base mixes venue types and many studies were not designed to test the full theory.
Neurodesign interpretation
Prospect-refuge is useful as a hypothesis generator, not a law. Neurodesign should not import landscape findings into bedrooms or hotels without marking the translation.
Possible design implications
Design sightlines and refuge deliberately but state whether evidence comes from interiors, landscapes or mixed contexts.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as a corrective to overconfident prospect-refuge claims.
Study design
Meta-analysis / critical synthesis
Population
Participants across environmental-preference studies
Setting
Natural, urban and interior settings
Field
Environmental preference
Mechanism
Prospect, refuge, complexity, mystery
Spatial variable
Visibility, enclosure, refuge, complexity
Keywords
prospect, refuge, complexity, preference
indexed under
related records
- ND-0034A systematic review and conceptual framework of biophilic design parameters in clinical environments
- ND-0059Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis
- ND-0084Multisensory nature exposure in the workplace: Exploring the restorative benefits of smell experiences
- ND-0023A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks
- ND-0027The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework
- ND-0028Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments