ND-0085 · 2024 · Experimental study
Beyond sight: Comparing traditional virtual reality and immersive multi-sensory environments in stress reduction of university students
Baktash, Kim & Shirazi. Frontiers in Virtual Reality. 2024-07-03.
doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1412297 · Web-verified
What the study found
Both immersive conditions reduced anxiety; the multisensory condition showed a larger reduction trend, though the between-group difference was not statistically decisive.
Limitations
Short exposure; student sample; simulated environment; bundled sensory cues.
Neurodesign interpretation
Multisensory design should be treated as interaction design between senses. More sensory input is not inherently more restorative.
Possible design implications
Do not assume adding more senses automatically improves an environment; test congruence and user tolerance.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as evidence for both the promise and uncertainty of multisensory enhancement.
Study design
Randomized two-condition experiment
Population
University students with moderate-to-high stress
Setting
Immersive simulated environment
Field
Multisensory design
Mechanism
Anxiety reduction, sensory integration
Spatial variable
Visual versus visual-auditory-olfactory environment
Keywords
multisensory, VR, stress, olfaction, audition
indexed under
related records
- ND-0084Multisensory nature exposure in the workplace: Exploring the restorative benefits of smell experiences
- ND-0018Dreamy Dwellings: How the Sleep Environment Affects Sleep Health in Adults
- ND-0077A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design
- ND-0081Psychophysiological responses to indoor wood use: A systematic literature review of indicators, methods, and research trends
- ND-0090Fractal Fluency: Processing of Fractal Stimuli Across Sight, Sound, and Touch
- ND-0001How indoor environmental quality affects occupants' cognitive functions: A systematic review