ND-0081 · 2026 · Systematic review
Psychophysiological responses to indoor wood use: A systematic literature review of indicators, methods, and research trends
Authors per journal record. Building and Environment. 2026-02-15.
doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.114188 · Web-verified
What the study found
Visual wood exposure is the most studied modality, with heart rate and prefrontal measures common; the field needs longer exposures and more diverse samples.
Limitations
Many studies are small, short and geographically concentrated; material dose and finish vary.
Neurodesign interpretation
The material question should move beyond 'wood is calming.' Grain, color, orientation, tactility, odor and coverage are separate sensory variables.
Possible design implications
Specify species, surface, finish, area, sensory mode and exposure duration in material research.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as the current evidence map for wood interiors.
Study design
Systematic literature review
Population
Human participants across reviewed experiments
Setting
Interior environments
Field
Materials, biophilia
Mechanism
Visual, tactile and multisensory psychophysiology
Spatial variable
Indoor wood exposure
Keywords
wood, materials, HRV, prefrontal, biophilia
indexed under
related records
- ND-0082Effect of Wood Indoor Environments on Human Psychophysiological Responses and Evaluation Indicators: A Review
- ND-0084Multisensory nature exposure in the workplace: Exploring the restorative benefits of smell experiences
- ND-0032Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments
- ND-0035Biophilic design in healthcare: a systematic review of health and wellbeing outcomes
- ND-0083Physiological effects of visual stimulation with full-scale wall images composed of vertically and horizontally arranged wooden elements
- ND-0085Beyond sight: Comparing traditional virtual reality and immersive multi-sensory environments in stress reduction of university students