ND-0079 · 2018 · Systematic review
Single-Occupancy Patient Rooms: A Systematic Review of the Literature Since 2006
Taylor, Card & Piatkowski. HERD. 2018.
doi.org/10.1177/1937586718755110 · Web-verified
What the study found
Most studies reported at least some advantages of single rooms, with stronger evidence for communication, infection control, noise/sleep and preference, but trade-offs remained.
Limitations
Methodological quality varied; system-level effects depend on staffing and unit configuration.
Neurodesign interpretation
A room cannot be evaluated without its care system. The same enclosure that protects sleep may reduce passive observation or social contact.
Possible design implications
Evaluate room type together with unit layout, staffing visibility and social-support design.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as the updated single-room review.
Study design
Systematic review
Population
Hospital patients and users across 43 studies
Setting
Hospitals
Field
Healthcare design
Mechanism
Privacy, communication, infection, sleep
Spatial variable
Single patient rooms
Keywords
single patient room, hospital, sleep, privacy, communication
indexed under
Mechanism
Spatial variable
related records
- ND-0078Do patients in hospitals benefit from single rooms? A literature review
- ND-0080Clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes associated with single rooms compared with shared accommodation for acute hospital admissions
- ND-0018Dreamy Dwellings: How the Sleep Environment Affects Sleep Health in Adults
- ND-0031View through a window may influence recovery from surgery
- ND-0077A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design
- ND-0012A review of the environmental parameters necessary for an optimal sleep environment