ND-0501 · 2017 · Other
Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A comparison of classroom context
Vercellotti. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2017.
doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735606 · Finding drafted from the abstract
Source details checked refers to publication information or an official source page. See the record’s limitations for incomplete extraction and the method for how to read the labels.
What the source reports
Interactive classrooms made no overall difference with the same teaching.
Design questions and applications
Room effects depend on teaching.
Field
Schools
Notes and follow-up
Added from the Corpus Desk (card vercellotti-2017-interactive-learning) on 2026-11-09. Evidence strength and translation distance not yet rated. WELL label held for review.
indexed under
related records
- ND-0006Ten questions concerning thermal and indoor air quality effects on the performance of office work and schoolwork
- ND-0020Auditory distraction from low-intensity noise: a review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments
- ND-0025Classroom acoustics and cognition: review of the effects of noise and reverberation on primary school children
- ND-0026Acoustical parameters for learning in classroom: A review
- ND-0122Longitudinal evidence for decreasing statistical learning abilities across childhood
- ND-0139Combined effects of acoustics and indoor air quality on calculation performance: a laboratory experiment and a lab-dilemma investigation