ND-0020 · 2005 · Review
Auditory distraction from low-intensity noise: a review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments
C. P. Beaman. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2005.
doi.org/10.1002/acp.1134 · Web-verified
What the study found
Low-intensity sound can impair serial recall and other tasks even when it is not subjectively loud.
Limitations
Laboratory paradigms may not map directly onto all real-world work.
Neurodesign interpretation
The acoustic question is what the brain can decode, not only what a meter can register.
Possible design implications
Control intelligibility and temporal variation of speech in concentration spaces.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain for the mechanism explaining why acoustic distraction is not reducible to decibels.
Study design
Review
Population
Humans across laboratory studies
Setting
Learning and workplace contexts
Field
Cognitive psychology, acoustics
Mechanism
Irrelevant-sound effect, working memory
Spatial variable
Background speech and low-intensity noise
Keywords
irrelevant speech, working memory, acoustics, distraction
indexed under
related records
- ND-0021The relation between intelligibility of irrelevant speech and cognitive performance: a revised model
- ND-0022Irrelevant speech effect in open-plan offices: A laboratory study
- ND-0019Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration
- ND-0026Acoustical parameters for learning in classroom: A review
- ND-0006Ten questions concerning thermal and indoor air quality effects on the performance of office work and schoolwork
- ND-0025Classroom acoustics and cognition: review of the effects of noise and reverberation on primary school children