ND-0431 · 2015 · Other
One size fits all? Mixed methods evaluation of the impact of 100% single-room accommodation on staff and patient experience, safety and costs
Maben, Griffiths, Penfold et al. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2015.
doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004265 · Finding drafted from the abstract
Source details checked refers to publication information or an official source page. See the record’s limitations for incomplete extraction and the method for how to read the labels.
What the source reports
After moving to 100% single rooms, patients preferred them but staff preferred a mix.
Design questions and applications
Plan staff visibility and teamwork alongside single rooms.
Field
Hospitals and psychiatric care
Notes and follow-up
Added from the Corpus Desk (card maben-2015-one-size) on 2026-11-09. Evidence strength and translation distance not yet rated. WELL label held for review.
indexed under
Field
Mechanism
related records
- ND-0034A systematic review and conceptual framework of biophilic design parameters in clinical environments
- ND-0035Biophilic design in healthcare: a systematic review of health and wellbeing outcomes
- ND-0077A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design
- ND-0080Clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes, including experiencing of patient safety events, associated with admitting patients to single rooms compared with shared accommodation for acute hospital admissions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
- ND-0199Effect of visual art on patient anxiety and agitation in a mental health facility and implications for the business case
- ND-0304The Role of Hospital Design in Reducing Anxiety for Pediatric Patients