ND-0112 · 2022 · Review
A theory of geometry representations for spatial navigation
Authors per journal record. Progress in Neurobiology. 2022.
doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102228 · Web-verified
What the study found
Synthesizes how the brain may represent environmental geometry for navigation across several coding systems.
Limitations
Theory integrates evidence from species and methods; architectural application remains inferential.
Neurodesign interpretation
Geometry is represented through multiple neural codes, so a single 'spatial map' metaphor is probably too simple for architecture.
Possible design implications
Use to organize human tests of corners, boundaries and layout deformation.
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as the modern geometry-navigation mechanism review.
Study design
Theory/review
Population
Animals and humans across neuroscience literature
Setting
Navigable spaces
Field
Spatial neuroscience
Mechanism
Geometry representation, navigation
Spatial variable
Boundaries, angles, distances, environmental geometry
Keywords
geometry, navigation, boundaries, spatial coding
indexed under
Field
Spatial variable
related records
- ND-0062Grid cell symmetry is shaped by environmental geometry
- ND-0063Deforming the metric of cognitive maps distorts memory
- ND-0065Evidence for grid cells in a human memory network
- ND-0066The boundary vector cell model of place cell firing and spatial memory
- ND-0114(Remembering) Vector Coding of Boundaries and Objects in the Subiculum
- ND-0043Toward Evidence-Based Neuroarchitecture: A Systematic Mapping and Framework for Immersive Spatial Cognition