ND-0028 · 2016 · Systematic review
Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments
Ohly et al. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B. 2016.
doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155 · Web-verified
What the study found
Some measures of attention improved after nature exposure, but findings varied substantially by test and study design.
Limitations
Heterogeneity and risk-of-bias issues limit strong universal conclusions.
Neurodesign interpretation
ART is plausible but not a blank check. Neurodesign should state which attentional function a space is intended to restore and how it will be measured.
Possible design implications
Use specific cognitive outcomes when testing restorative design rather than global claims about 'focus.'
Why it stays in the corpus
Retain as the first major ART evidence audit.
Study design
Systematic review
Population
Humans across 31 studies
Setting
Natural, simulated and laboratory settings
Field
Environmental psychology
Mechanism
Attention restoration
Spatial variable
Nature exposure
Keywords
ART, nature, attention, systematic review
indexed under
related records
- ND-0023A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks
- ND-0027The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework
- ND-0029Attention Restoration Theory II: systematic review of attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments
- ND-0031View through a window may influence recovery from surgery
- ND-0034A systematic review and conceptual framework of biophilic design parameters in clinical environments
- ND-0036Biophilic Design in the Built Environment: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions