ND-0253 · 2018 · Other
Individual differences in aesthetic engagement are reflected in resting-state fMRI connectivity: Implications for stress resilience
Williams, Johnson, Curtis et al. NeuroImage. 2018.
doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.042 · Finding drafted from the abstract
Source details checked refers to publication information or an official source page. See the record’s limitations for incomplete extraction and the method for how to read the labels.
What the source reports
Greater aesthetic engagement went with greater integration of the default mode network with sensory and salience networks at rest.
Field
Beauty and the brain
Notes and follow-up
Added from the Corpus Desk (card williams-2018-engagement) on 2026-11-09. Evidence strength and translation distance not yet rated. WELL label held for review.
indexed under
Field
Mechanism
related records
- ND-0084Multisensory nature exposure in the workplace: Exploring the restorative benefits of smell experiences
- ND-0105The effects of interior design on users' psychological health under isolated, confined, and extreme environments: A systematic review
- ND-0179The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments
- ND-0538Exploring Psychophysiological Restoration and Individual Preference in the Different Environments Based on Virtual Reality
- ND-0055Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture
- ND-0056Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects